Bishop Edwin Regan
                       Bishop of Wrexham
                      
It
                        was recorded in the Catholic Herald of the 4 April 2003,
                        that when the Latin Mass Society complained that he only
                        permitted one traditional Mass per week in his diocese,
                        this grinning smug Modernist responded to the effect
                        that he was surprised that it was that much!
                      He then continued "One
                        of the problems is that other things get clustered
                        around it - a certain reluctance in some people to
                        accept Vatican II.  It can be used as a way of
                        looking at the past which isn't entirely healthy."  One
                        can only assume that the busy bishop has not had time
                        to get round to actually reading the documents of Vatican
                        II, which of course mandated that the liturgy of the
                        Latin Church should remain Latin!  Sacrosanctum
                          Concilium, Vatican ll’s decree on the Sacred
                        Liturgy, states: 36 (1) The use of the Latin
                          language, with due respect to particular law, is
                            to be preserved in the Latin rites.  The
                        comment about looking at the past in a way "which
                          is not entirely healthy" presumably means
                        that there are still some reactionaries who do not
                        share his lordship's view that the last 2000 years
                        has been one long unmitigated cock-up, from which we
                        were only rescued by the blinding insights of our post-Conciliar
                        shepherds.
                      He then concluded, "Where
                        it not for Vatican II, church attendance would be even
                        less."  Some may be a little surprised
                        to learn that Vatican II was supposed to merely stop
                        church attendance from becoming "even less."  After
                        all, we had been lead to believe, if my memory is serving
                        me correctly, that it was intended to usher in a brave
                        new glorious dawn of Catholicism!  When the English
                        church has been reduced to a remnant, which will be
                        in less than 20 years at the present rate of implosion
                        of around 100,000 souls every three years, this irrepressible
                        grinning Modernist will no doubt be cheerily assuring
                        us that "Where it not for Vatican II, the Church
                          would have vanished even faster."
                      One is entitled
                        to wonder how his lordship arrived at his conclusion.  It
                        is of course self-evident that in the Gnostic illuminated
                        mindset of our newChurch pioneers, facts and rational
                        arguments are not required.  After all, if you have
                        your own private line to the Holy Spirit, who needs trivia
                        like facts and sound arguments?  His lordship is
                        rather like a bus driver, who having swerved and knocked
                        down a couple of healthy young men and left them bleeding
                        to death in the road, proffers in his defence, "Had
                          I not taken the trouble to knock them down, they may
                          have come to an even stickier end."  Which
                        I suppose could be true..... if you think about it long
                        enough.  Nevertheless, I do not believe that one
                        could censure the young men in question if they did not
                        find this line of argument entirely convincing.
                      Jubilee
                        2000 Congress Report
                      Concerned readers
                        in Wales sent us copies of the Jubilee 2000 Congress
                        Report from the Wrexham Diocese. The Congress, held on
                        - 27th - 28th October 2000, spawned this official looking
                        report with the Jubilee Logo on its cover, which includes
                        such recommendations as: using "inclusive language",
                        demanding "more sensitive language from Rome (immediately
                        if not sooner)" and stopping use of the phrase "non-Catholic".
                        More seriously, it also calls for an end to the "exclusion
                        of other Christians from the Eucharist". Sadly,
                        we have come to expect this sort of fare from those with
                        a politically correct or dissenting agenda, but it was
                        very disturbing to see that the introduction to the report
                        had been written and signed by Bishop Edwin Regan of
                        Wrexham Diocese. His introduction began
                        "Three years ago, we asked ourselves a question: How could the Church
                        develop in our Diocese of Wrexham to reflect the Gospel more effectively?"
                        Not by implementing the above suggestions, obviously!
                        The report is clearly unrepresentative of what ordinary
                        faithful Catholics would expect and initial information
                        received suggests that not a few in Wrexham are very
                        unhappy about its recommendations.
                      Goodbye to another grinning Modernist 
                       On 27 June 2012 it was announced that
                        Pope Benedict had accepted Bishop Regan's resignation.